REMEDY IN LAW
NOTICE: THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, THE WEB SITE AND ITS AFFILIATES DO NOT GIVE LEGAL ADVICE AND DOES NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBLITY OR LIABLITY FOR ANY ACTION YOU TAKE AS A RESULT OF THIS INFORMATION. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY:USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. THINK TWICE BEFORE YOU TAKE ANY ACTIONS, LAW IS NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART, AND TAKES A LONG TIME TO LEARN WITH DEDICATION. YOU SHOULD SEEK LEGAL ADVICE FROM A BAR LAWYER BEFORE TAKING ANY ACTION, ANY ACTION YOU DO TAKE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK AND LIABILITY. YOU WILL BE PREJUDICED AND TERRORIZED
PUBLIC SERVANTS ARE PEOPLE TO, MOST OF THEM GOOD PEOPLE, THE GOOD OUTNUMBER THE BAD, MOST ARE IGNORANT AND JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS.ANYONE WHO ABUSES A PROCESS OF LAW TO THEIR ADVANTAGE OR TERRORIZE WILL BE DEALT WITH.
 | ||||||
EVERY THING IS A CONTRACT;
Did you know everything government does is a contract; taxes are a contract, drivers license is a contract, all government law is a contract under section 32. of their Charter? They've tricked the masses to also accepting a contract to be under governments authority the moment you accepted a benefit/privilege such as child tax or EI; anything you sign is a contract, with you're signature taking liability. this is why they can come at you anytime they wish, claiming you're liable for this and that, but its quite easy to turn that liability right back at them.
A Contract is An agreement between two or more competent parties in which an offer is made and accepted and each party benefits. Agreements can either be formal or informal, written, oral, or implied. Examples of contracts include leases, promissory notes, rental agreements, etc, but a drivers license is also a contract, in fact everything government does is a contact.
There are five necessary components to make a contractual agreement;
1. an offer; "I'll wash your car for $20"
2. acceptance of the offer; "sure, only if you do the inside too"
3. the intention to enter into a legally binding agreement; "okay I'll do the inside too but i
want payment as soon as I'm done"
4. consideration; both parties get something, one gets $20 the other gets the work done
5. must be entered into freely, can not be forced.
BUT, GOVERNMENT CONSTANTLY ALTERS THE CONTRACT; government constantly changes the contract by adding laws, stiffer fines, seizure of car and dl, all with our consent, bc the number TWO rule of law is, YOUR SILENCE IS YOUR CONSENT.
number ONE rules is "IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE" which of course they use that too against you.
sooo, why not renegotiate the contract, just like they do, using their silence to make it legal. this is how I was able to drive without a dl for four years & haven't paid business license in ten years.
People don't understand law anymore, they don't understand law is happening 24/7/365, law is not just for a courtroom. A court room is ONLY when disputes and contracts can not be settled in the private, then the Parties come before the Public in HIS MAJESTY'S COURT, where the King's Vicar/Agent makes a ruling based on the law at hand, which since the 1500's has been the Magna Carta and Common Law in a civil proceeding.
Your Court is expressed on paper, in the form of Legal Notices, which are binding in a court of law. Affidavits being your silver bullet; "it is my understanding that I have the right to use "CROWN" land for survival and living, if you have any proof or material evidence to prove my understanding is wrong, please provide it to me within 21 days, or your non-response will be taken to be understood you agree with my understanding"
Government legislation is not Public law, it is a Private Law, it only apples to government; read section 32 of their Charter. however they've duped you and I into becoming government Agents in exchange for benefit privileges [gst cheque, child welfare cheque, pension] if you take their money its your consent for them to do wtf ever they want. They have duped you and I into being Agents
YOU have your court, so why not invoke your jurisdiction under common law, and renegotiate the contacts governments or even corporations have with you?
SCARY, isn't it, taking on a giant like government or corporations, but "fear not as i walk through the valley of Evil" bc EVERY SINGLE MAN WOMAN AND CHILD IS LIABLE FOR THIER ACTIONS! Trust me, they fear us far more than we fear them, bc their secret is every single one of them is liable for their actions, each public servant is required to have two things;
First is a licence to operate in the public, including a "scope of office" which outlines what they can do, and hence, what they can't do, catch them doing something they shouldn't be doing, like threating you, their ass is grass!
Second is a Bond, which indemnifies their actions, but only the actions outlined in their scope of office, you catch them doing something that is not within the scope of office, they have to pay out of their own pockets. you want to see a shaking public servant, you just corner them with the law and watch them shit their pants.
The silver bullet is, Public Servants/ Agents are required to provide it to a member of the Public when requested :)
Under English law, misconduct (or misfeasance) in public office is an offence at common law which dates back to the 13th century.[1][2]
The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. It is confined to those who are public office holders, and is committed when the office holder acts (or neglects to act) in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office.[3]
The Crown Prosecution Service guidelines on this offence[1] say that the elements of the offence are when:
1. A public officer acting as such.
2. Wilfully neglects to perform ones duty and/or wilfully misconducts oneself.
3. To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder.[4]
4. Without reasonable excuse or justification.
The similarly named malfeasance (or misfeasance) in public office is a tort. In the House of Lords judgement on the BCCI malfeasance case it was held that this had 3 essential elements:[5]
1. The defendant must be a public officer
2. The defendant must have been exercising his power as a public officer
3. The defendant is either exercising targeted malice or exceeding his powers
"Misconduct in public office" is often but inaccurately rendered as "misconduct in a public office", which has a different meaning.
______________________________________________________________________________
People don't realize every politician and public servant is required to have two things, two things that even you and I are required in order to do business in the public.
1. License to operate that defines who and where you are, what you can and can not do in the public. Just like a drivers license can be canceled for to many points from bad driving, a public servant can have his license removed so he can no longer work in that field bc they pose a risk to the public.
2. Bond/Insurance that indemnifies the public in the event something they do harms the public, it outlines their "scope of office" defining what they can and can not do.
A class 5 drivers license defines it is for operating cars and light trucks, insurance required is for class five only, meaning the insurance covers the driver for cars but not commercial trucks.
Tort Law is harm or damage done in the private, outside the public servants "scope of office" so then his insurance will not pay for the damages, the public servant would have to pay out of his own pocket.
same as drinking driving voids the insurance bc its not within the scope of coverage, so then the drunk would have to pay for the accident they caused out of their own pockets.
Unfortunately government subverts these facts, treason by its own actions, for if no one can be held liable there are no limits to the tyranny and corruption public servants can get away with; evidenced by the recent covid plandemic in which politicians are doing anything they want that is harming millions of people with no recourse.
These tool can be used against these psychopaths; The Key to ending every bit of fraud and unaccountability on every level of government, holding each Public Servant accountable is to access their public bond and insurance.
When they fail to provide their license and proof of Bond/insurance then you can legally lien their private property.
Furthermore, their kryptonite is when we can find who their insurance company is, we can petition the company directly, file a claim with the insurance company who then has no choice but to launch a investigation.
Freedom of Information Act may help, though it is an "Act"
THE KEY AND MISSION IF YOU SO CHOOSE TO ACCEPT THE MISSION IS TO FIND WHERE AND HOW TO GAIN ACCESS TO PUBLIC SERVANTS LICENSE AND BOND INFO.
DEALING WITH DEBT COLLECTORS:
In my experience most debt can be legally and lawfully settled using these remedies in the law.
Its a liberating feeling when you defend yourself from a government body threatening to ruin seize your bank account. A giant weight lifted from your shoulders.
Its not about breaking the law, or sticking it to the man, or getting things for free, often times the government makes unreasonable demands, or makes mistakes without anyone in government being held accountable. Corporations take advantage of people, overcharging, bullying, threatening.
This is a way to answer a bill, often times credit card debts can be settle for half. its about staying in honour and doing the best that you can. People are going bankrupt, loosing their homes, bank accounts seized, loss of sleep, anxiety, it doesn't have to be that way. always stand in honour.
when someone sends a "bill" or a claim you owe them something, there are three options
1. ignore the notice, though you are in default, and you loose, your property can be lien or siezed
2. deny the claim, though evidence may be stacked against you and you loose again
3. conditionally accept the notice, [sure I'll pay as soon as you prove I owe]
Before you ask any questions I suggest you download a copy of Ballentine's Law, Bouviers Law and a decent financial terms dictionary i.e. Investors Terms.
Then read the letters and ALL of the accompanying instructions.
Then go through every word/term that you do not understand and the ones YOU THINK you understand using the dictionaries you now got free of charge.
It will take you a week at 4-5 hours a day to even begin to grasp what it is you are thinking of doing.
Then think about what questions you need answering.
There should be none
Additional material in relation to this is in the Books and PDFs titled 'Natural Commerce".
Dealing with Bankers….
The following 5 letters have been successfully used by a great many people over the past few years to effectively deal with creditor difficulties. We make no representations to the effectiveness of this strategy and we strongly advise interested parties to seek independent professional or competent advise when
utilizing such strategies.
Letter Number 1:
For use with just about any type of financial obligation issued by a licensed financial institution mortgage, credit card, bank loan etc. (Does not work
if the loan is from a “private” source.)
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I would like to make arrangements to settle the above referenced matter.
Please provide me with your statement of the amount owing as of ___(pick date 2 weeks out for example)___, together with your assurance that you will accept payment in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Thank you very much.
___________________________
by: authorized party
Letter Number 2A:
For use with adjustments in most cases when
you receive the initial response from Letter 1 above,
where they confirm an amount owing and provide
some comment that the “statements” or some other
lame documentation they provide are evidence of the
obligation.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
Thank you for your letter of __date______, wherein you confirm my outstanding balance as requested.
Also, you have confirmed that the
“statements that _____(name of institution here)____
sends are your evidence of your indebtedness to the
Bank”. (This is a quote from actual bank letter and
wording may vary slightly, but should where possible
be quoted from their letter.)
Accordingly, would you please confirm that the Agreement that exists between us which ratifies this specific application of these “statements” and confirms me as the party obligated to the Bank will be delivered to me as the original instrument of
indebtedness in its original form, in exchange for payment in full of my obligation as may be referenced by these “statements”.
Sincerely,
__________________________________________________
by: authorized party
Letter Number 2B:
For use with adjustments in other cases when
you receive the initial response from Letter 1 above,
where they confirm an amount owing and simply
ignore the second part of the request.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number:__________
To Whom it may concern:
Thank you for your letter of ________, wherein you confirm my outstanding balance as
requested.
It is apparent that you have overlooked or ignored my request to confirm that you would accept full payment of the alleged obligation from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Accordingly, unless I receive your written confirmation that you will accept payment from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original
instrument of indebtedness in its original form on or before ____(pick a date like 15 days from sending the letter)____, I will conclude that you are either unable or unwilling to comply, and I will thereafter consider the matter between us to have been legally and
financially settled.
Sincerely,
________________________________________________
by: authorized party
Letter Number 3:
For use with adjustments in other cases when
you receive NO response from Letter #1 above.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number:__________
To Whom it may concern:
I have sent you my request as of ___(date)___ for you to confirm the balance owing
on the above referenced matter and for you to confirm that you would accept full payment of the alleged obligation from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
It is apparent that you have overlooked or ignored my request. Accordingly, unless I receive your written confirmation that you will accept payment from me in consideration of your delivery to me of the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form on or before ____(pick a date like 15 days from sending the letter)____, I will conclude that you are either unable or unwilling to comply, and I will thereafter consider the matter between us to have been legally and financially settled.
Sincerely,
______________________________________________________
by: authorized party
NOTES:
1. The concepts outlined in these documents
will also work for most Court Orders to pay. Simply
change the wording such that you are requesting
confirmation that the court will accept payment in
consideration of their delivery to you of the Original
Order, as duly executed by ___(Judge name)___ and
in its original form (which is the original instrument
of indebtedness).
2. This process will not work with private
lenders because in most cases they can and will
produce the original instrument of indebtedness.
3. If you receive any communication from a
collection agency or lawyer representing the financial
institution, you should follow the concepts outlined
in the above letters but ONLY in direct
correspondence with the financial institution.
NEVER respond to a lawyer or collection agency
with anything other than the concept outlined in
Letter 4 that follows.
Letter Number 4:
For use with when terminating
communication from financial institution’s lawyer or
collection agent.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I confirm that I have received a written communication from you dated ___(date)___
wherein you make reference to the above captioned matter.
It is apparent that you are acting on the presumption that some relationship that you may
have with ___(name of bank)___ , is in some way related to me. I am not a party to this implied relationship you have with ___(name of bank)___, either directly, indirectly or by means of any tacit consent.
Accordingly, I do not understand how to respond to you inasmuch as I am unaware of any contractual relationship between us.
As a courtesy and because you may find it helpful, I have attached recent correspondence
between myself and ___(name of bank)___, wherein I have repeatedly offered to settle the mater between myself and ___(name of bank)___.
Sincerely,
___________________________
by: authorized party
c.c file
Letter Number 5:
Alternate for use with when terminating
communication from financial institution’s lawyer or
collection agent.
From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage,
etc.)
Account Number: __________
To Whom it may concern:
I confirm that I have received a written communication from you addressed to
_____________ and dated ____________ wherein you make reference to the above captioned matter.
It is apparent that either:
i) you are acting on the presumption that some relationship that you may have with
__(name of bank)__, is in some way related to me, which if such presumption is the case, I confirm that I am not a party to this implied relationship you have with __(name of bank)__, either directly, indirectly or by means of any tacit consent, and accordingly, I do
not understand how to respond to you inasmuch as I am unaware of any contractual relationship between us; or
ii) you have entered into a contractual relationship inclusive of evidence of consideration
paid to or agreed to be paid to __(name of bank)__, which contractual relationship has caused you to become the legal holder in due course of an alleged
obligation between ____________ and __(name of
bank)__.
If indeed you have entered into such a contractual relationship with __(name of bank)__, as set forth in clause ii) above, then I hereby confirm that I accept your offer to reduce the amount of the alleged obligation from $______ to $______; and I confirm that I would like to make arrangements for settlement of the above referenced matter immediately upon you providing me with your written and legally binding assurance that you will
accept payment in full settlement of this alleged obligation in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original
form that you must now be holding pursuant to the aforesaid contractual arrangement between you and __(name of bank)__.
Sincerely,
_____________________________________________
by: authorized party
NOTE: underlined portion in last paragraph
may be omitted if not applicable.
What is right and wrong DOES matter in life:
All the money in existence in our monetary systems has been borrowed at interest from a bank. When all currency in the system is borrowed at interest, there is NO MATHEMATICAL WAY to pay one penny of interest without pushing some people off the table via cancellation of their obligations to pay principal through bankruptcy, or through the kind of cancellation programs offered.
Reform must come from the side of dissatisfied customers, because the lenders have NO
motivation to move away from their current position of power and influence. If people who favour the customer over the lender are able to use the law to stimulate change, any imbalance created by giving people their real estate for free will best correct itself
through a change in banking laws and practice, NOT through perpetuation of the present system of GRAND THEFT of the entire wealth of society by the banking cartels.
Under the present system, someone HAS to get something for NOTHING. There is no other way.
Either the bankers continue to get interest payments for NOTHING at risk, or customers get free real estate after "borrowing" money that was created out of NOTHING and having the "loan" either canceled for fraud, or discharged in bankruptcy, or the lender
gets the real estate from the customer for NOTHING, following a foreclosure on the loan that was created out of NOTHING.
The answer is to stop basing bank lending on NOTHING.
The federal courts in Canada have stated that either the common man wake up and use the common law, the rights and freedoms available to him....or lose it for ever.
That is your choice.
p.s.
The strategy's outlined in these letters are derived from and compliant with the tax laws in most countries world-wide. :D :D
